Nuns Particularly Condemned for Cruelty to Children
Published on January 16, 2005 By theknitter In Health & Medicine
Official

Official Letter Condemns Religious Orders

 

 

Gross Malnutrition of Children in Industrial Schools

 

13 Eanar 1945

I.R.226/44,

Runai,
Roinn Airgeadais

I am directed by the Minister for Education to inform you that he is gravely concerned at the evidence which has been reaching him for a considerable time of the malnutrition of children in industrial schools, particularly those for girls and junior boys. Shortly after her appointment in 1939, the Department's Medical Inspector, Dr. McCabe, set about the task of bringing the dietary in these schools up to such a level that the children would thrive on it and put on weight in a normal way. She revised the diet scales in all schools and advised individual schools on the deficiencies in their dietaries. She introduced a system whereby the resident manager of every school is required to keep a medical chart in respect of each child, upon which, inter alia, the weight and height of the child must be entered each quarter. These charts enable the child's progress in weight to be compared with the normal for its age and height.

These and other measures brought about a marked improvement during the early war years. Unfortunately this has not been maintained and the position for some time past has been serious. The Medical Inspector has stated time and again that the general standard of nutrition is too low. This grave state of affairs is due, to a degree which varies with the circumstances of each individual school, to the following causes:

(1) Inability to provide adequate quantities of food owing to the rise in prices;
(2) Failure to do so owing to parsimony; and
(3) Failure to provide a properly balanced diet (even when the quantity is adequate) owing to lack of training in the management of institutions for children and ignorance of fundamental dietetic principles.

As to (1), the payment of the State capitation grant on all committed children (instead of on the "certified number") and the increase from 5s/ - to 7s/6d per week of the State and local authority grants for children under 6, (both changes took effect as from the 1st July last), have done something to ease the schools' financial position. When pressed to improve diet, however, managers complain continually that they cannot afford to do so, or that they can do so only by economising elsewhere e.g. in clothing. The Association of Managers has applied for an emergency bonus of 5s/- per week per child. There is no doubt that the schools, particularly the smaller ones and those that have no farms or very small ones, have a case for an emergency increase in their income (in common with every other section of the community) if they are to be compelled to maintain, and in many cases, to improve upon, their pre-war standards of food and clothing.

As to (2), the strongest possible action has been taken in all cases where the Department was satisfied that parsimony was the predominant cause of gross malnutrition. Two resident managers have been removed from office at the request of the Minister for Education. Others have been solemnly warned and will be removed in due course if there is no adequate improvement. (In one such case in Co. Cork the warning was given personally by the Secretary to the Department accompanied by the Inspector of Reformatory and Industrial Schools.)

As to (3), this is a contributory cause of malnutrition in all schools, particularly those conducted by nuns, and an effort to eradicate it is an essential part of the general attack on malnutrition. It is proposed to have a course in institutional management and UNREADABLE next summer and to invite the sister or sisters in charge of the catering in each of the 43 schools conducted by nuns to attend. The City of Dublin Vocational Committee will be asked to conduct the course in Colaiste Muire le Tigheas, Cathal Brugha Street, and to make available the services of professors on their staff who are highly skilled in these subjects. From preliminary discussions between officers of the Committee and the Department it has been ascertained that the course could be specially framed framed to suit the actual conditions existing in the schools. It would deal with the fundamentals of institutional cookery as applied to industrial school needs. Practical training in essential {processes} and dishes would be given and particular attention would be paid to methods of serving large quantities of food. There would also be lectures on the economic planning of menus in accordance with dietetic needs, on costing, storage, and preparation of foodstuffs. In addition, the Department's Medical Inspector would avail of the opportunity to give some lectures on balance in diet, hygiene, etc,. The course should last for four weeks.

Having regard to the background out of which this proposal emerges - persistent pressure by the Department on the schools to spend more money on food and constant complaints from the schools that they cannot afford to do so - it will be clear that the course must not involve the schools in any expense if there is to be a reasonable prospect of securing their co-operation. It is proposed to make a grant of 9 (nine pounds) towards the expenses of each nun from a school outside Dublin City who attends the course - 2 pounds for travelling expenses, 6 pounds for four weeks hostel expenses in Dublin, and 1 pound for materials and part maintenance (they will eat meals they prepare). Nuns from Dublin City schools would receive the grant of 1 pound only.

The estimated cost of the course is as follows:
Instruction:
1 Teacher at 40 pounds = 40 pounds
2 Asst. Teachers at 30 pounds each = 60 pounds
Attendants and rent = 15 pounds

Travelling and subsistence
Say 50 nuns at 9 pounds each= 450 pounds
Total: 565 pounds

The figure might be rounded up to 600 pounds to cover the possibility of a greater attendance than now anticipated. This amount could be provided in a new subhead B1 in Vote 50 entitled "Summer course in institutional management for members of communities conducting industrial and reformatory schools for girls"

I am to request the sanction of the Minister for Finance for the conduct of this course and the inclusion of provision accordingly in Vote 50 for 1945/46

Leas Runai

 

SOURCE MAY CORNISH

 

HOME


Comments
on Jan 16, 2005
We are being asked to participate in a farce with the revelation of this letter by the Department for Education. The Department are asking us to believe that they, in the person of Dr. McCabe, were concerned about our welfare. In particular our nutrition. But the Department FAILS to mention that most of the religious orders "managing" the Institutions were ALREADY MANAGING, very successfully too, SECONDARY SCHOOLS and BOARDING SCHOOLS. Why the fuck would these religious orders need a course in Institutional Management and Catering? What EXACTLY about the CARE OF CHILDREN and THE NUTRITIONAL NEEDS OF CHILDREN did these religious orders NOT UNDERSTAND - hadn't these religious orders been looking after the needs of children in their SECONDARY SCHOOLS AND BOARDING SCHOOLS since before the foundation of the State? Why were NO QUESTIONS on this matter ASKED of the representative of the Sisters of Mercy during her recent "CHAT" at the RYAN "investigation"?
on Jan 17, 2005
In Sisters of Mercy Secondary Schools and Boarding Schools during the 30's, 40's, 50's, & 60's et al GUESS WHAT WAS ON THE SYLLABUS of these POSH institutions ? .... YES .... HOME ECONOMICS ....................... fucking home economics!!! What the FUCK would this religious order need of an INSTITUTIONAL MANAGEMENT COURSE. In Sisters of Mercy Primary Schools you actually studied HOME ECONOMICS so when you went on to their POSH schools you did Advanced HOME ECONOMICS.

WHY hasn't anyone, ANYONE, asked the representative of this religious order how they could STARVE - ILL-TREAT & BRUTALISE one set of children and YET another set of children can have the knowledge of HOME ECONOMICS passed onto them by a religious order whom the State, represented by the Education Department, feels should sit a EDUCATION COURSE in CATERING FOR THE NUTRITIONAL NEEDS OF CHILDREN?

Aren't the Sisters of Mercy a TEACHING ORDER ??
on Jan 18, 2005
Um Did you see what year it was? It's over 50 years ago.
on Jan 19, 2005
Yes .... over 50 years ago ..... and the group representing these religious orders have been denying the abuse, the neglect, the ill-treatment of children in their care for the past 10 years. Indeed the Christian Brothers were denying any abuse took place in THEIR institutions DESPITE the fact that SEVERAL OF THEIR MEMBERS are now serving prison terms for GROSS ABUSES against children .......... The Rosminians (Brothers of Charity) another religious order "caring" for children also has several members in jail, and this order only admitted in September 2005 that it had abusers in its ranks, that it moved these abusers around Ireland, it admitted that one of the children in its care was violently raped when the Pope visited Ireland in 1979. The Sisters of Mercy recently issued a fulsome apology to all those who feel they were abused in Institutions they were managing .... but added that there was NO EVIDENCE OF ABUSE IN THEIR FILES ...... then THIS LETTER (over 50 years old albeit) turns up. Now it could be argued that it might not have ALL ITS FILES from so long ago .... but it kept files on children who made their first confession but not medical files - it kept files on visits by bishops but no files on admissions to hospitals by children in their care ..... ...... Thank you for pointing out that the letter was over 50 years old .... and I hope that I've pointed out that abuses were taking place in these Institutions and that there was, and is, a not so very clever attempt to deny this abuse.
on Jan 21, 2005
great stuff
on Jan 21, 2005
slowly slowly catchee monkee
on Jan 21, 2005
Thanks ,,,,, Harry
on Jan 21, 2005
Dear Florence

Having read and re-read the latest transcripts from the "child abuse" Commission I have come across a possible glaring mis-carriage of justice. A letter was produced by the Department for Education and parts of the letter contain the usual stuff about the Minister being "gravely concerned at the evidence which has been reaching him for a considerable time of the malnutrition of children in industrial schools" and using phrases like "grave state of affairs", but what caught my eye was the proposal, nay demand, that the religious orders managing these Institutions attend what I can only describe as a Home Economics Course!!

Doesn't that beat all? I mean most of these religious orders were managing Boarding Schools and Secondary schools in Ireland long long before the State was even founded!! This is a blatant attempt to put ALL THE BLAME on the religious orders managing the Institutions.

It's very insulting to the Sisters of Mercy to imply that they were "parsimonious" in their management of these Institutions because this same order had been managing Boarding Schools with almost the same amount of money that they were receiving from the State to look after the children confined in the Institutions. Who can possibly believe that the Sisters of Mercy would deliberately starve children who were confined to the Institutions that they managed?

And having the Sisters of Charity attend this Home Economics Course is also HIGHLY INSULTING to these good sisters too as this order of selfless women were actually running hospitals for sick children (no less) and had been in that caring position for years before and since. Who on this earth could believe that this order of dedicated christian women would deliberately and maliciously withold care from children who were confined to Institutions that they managed? Who?

Regards

The Knitter