Cruelty To Children
Cruelty To Children
Dear Florence
Having read and re-read the latest transcripts from the "child abuse"
Commission I have come across a possible glaring mis-carriage of
justice. A letter
was produced by the Department for Education and
parts of the letter contain the usual stuff about the Minister being
"gravely concerned at the evidence which has been reaching him for a
considerable time of the malnutrition of children in industrial
schools" and using phrases like "grave state of affairs", but what
caught my eye was the proposal, nay demand, that the religious orders
managing these Institutions attend what I can only describe as a Home
Economics Course!!
Doesn't that beat all? I mean most of these religious orders were
managing Boarding Schools and Secondary schools in Ireland long long
before the State was even founded!! This is a blatant attempt to put ALL THE BLAME on the religious orders managing the Institutions.
It's very insulting to the Sisters of Mercy to imply that they were
"parsimonious" in their management of these Institutions because this
same order had been managing Boarding Schools with almost the same
amount of money that they were receiving from the State to look after
the children confined in the Institutions. Who can possibly believe
that the Sisters of Mercy would deliberately starve children who were
confined to the Institutions that they managed?
And having the Sisters of Charity attend this Home Economics Course is
also HIGHLY INSULTING to these good sisters too as this order of
selfless women were actually running hospitals for sick children (no
less) and had been in that caring position for years before and since.
Who on this earth could believe that this order of dedicated
christian women would deliberately and maliciously withhold care from
children who were confined to Institutions that they managed? Who?
Regards
The Knitter
ALL of them Andrew. Why then
are there Department of Health records
stating(1950's) that "the Sisters themselves seem malnourished and
exhausted"?
How you managed to get your slant is amazing. Just because the Dept of
Education suggested that the managers (the same ones who spent 10 years
begging for more funds to run the homes!) do a Home Economics course, you
feel this is implying they were being parsimonious, and getting all the
blame?
Not at all - Home Economics is mostly cooking/sewing/knitting. Didn't
you lot do that in Artane? The full story of overcrowding, underfunding and
untrained personnel running what amounted (in some cases) to juvenile
detention centres will be part of the end result.
FHH
Hello Florence,
I was never in Artane, well not true as I
was given a tour of it in December 2004. My first time ever to see Artane.
I am quite sure there ARE
statements to the effect that "the Sisters themselves seem malnourished and
exhausted". The nuns themselves had a hierarchy, so to speak, where one set
of nuns would be left to do cleaning, child care, labouring tasks while another
set of nuns would look after the paper work, office work and so on and another
set of nuns would be the overseers of both these groups. And there would have
been other nuns above all these. I know this because a relative of mine (on the
non-Church of Ireland side) was in a convent for 15 years as a novice nun and
then a "proper" nun. But I do know that the green mash I received for my dinner
was not also being served to any of the nuns charged with my care.
But that said I didn't imply that the nuns
were parsimonious - that's offered in the letter as one of the reasons for the "malnutrition
of children".
Child Care is not akin to Rocket
Science - - - the nuns were receiving MORE MONEY in capitation grants
for me than my father was earning in work, and he had to care for 3 children on
his wages? And while I was at home (I went into Care when I was 5 years and 3
months old, my brother was 3 years old) with my father I regularly had eggs,
bacon, sausages, tomatoes, fresh bread, butter, milk etc., I was well-dressed
and had a wide circle of relatives and friends, I was attending school too. So
why couldn't the nuns provide for me even half of what my father could provide.
Yes I did learn how to Knit and Sew, but
not how to cook. I was a dab hand at knitting jumpers, cardigans and socks, my
darning skills were also excellent. I shone in the tailor shop too and could "knock-up"
a mans suit in a week. In the shoe-shop I excelled too, I regularly etched
designs into the toe-caps of our boots and had occasion to create and etch
designs on stock sold outside of the Industrial School. As you can gather I am
quite a practical person. So naturally when I was allowed out "on licence" I was
sent to a guesthouse/hotel as a skiivy - and was eventually promoted to floor
polisher. So Much For Practical Skills.
Child Care is NOT rocket
science - it's a full-time job OK but men and women have been rearing children
for millennia upon millennia yet the religious orders of Ireland seemed to think
that the needs of the orders were of equal, if not more, importance to the needs
of children. When they were failing - and there IS plenty in THEIR
letters that they were failing - they should have done the Christian thing and
given up their day jobs and gone back to contemplating their navels! They
couldn't do the job they were paid to do and they should have stopped pretending
they could CARE FOR CHILDREN.
But then again there is a big difference
to practical Christianity and theoretical Christianity.
Best Regards